Back to Trademark monitoring

Do I need a service for trademark monitoring?

Senior Trademark Attorney

Not necessarily; self-monitoring is possible since trademark databases are publicly accessible. Whether a service is worth the cost depends on the commercial value of the brand and how much time and consistency you can dedicate to manual monitoring.

The case for a service comes down to two things: reliability and scope. Manual monitoring requires regular, consistent searches to avoid missing a conflicting application within the opposition window. A service does this automatically and covers a broader range of channels (domain names, social media, marketplaces) that are impractical to monitor manually at any useful frequency.

Set up trademark monitoring with Trama to catch similar filings as soon as they appear.

Related questions

a-man-working-in-a-furniture-makers-workshop-assem-SVBH9EH 2

12 good reasons for furniture companies to register a trademark

There is a myriad of reasons why trademark registration is of a crucial importance for furniture companies. This article presents a concise summary of 12 key reasons why every furniture retailer should think about registering for a trademark.

Perceived similarity of trademarks: Lessons from Starbucks trademark disputes

One of the most common reasons for trademark disputes has to do with the perceived similarity between existing trademarks. The two trademarks are considered “similar” if they share common characteristics connected to their appearance, sound, meaning and commercial impression, and if they are used for related goods or services. This is seen as a problem from brand perspective because the consumers might believe that the owners of the two trademarks are related, affiliated, connected, or that the goods or services originate from the same source.

Meta versus Meta: Facebook faced with multiple lawsuits following their rebrand

Tech-giant formerly known as Facebook announced a rebrand and a change of its name to Meta. Following that, there were many discussions about whether a company as big as Facebook could even end up holding a complete monopoly over such generic word given hundreds of already existing trademarks in the same field of services. The results of these disputes will be decisive for the future of Meta.